Murphy – Harpst Childrens Center

My daughter is currently in here due to her behavior typical teenage stuff she didn't do anything that bad but she still shouldn't have done it but at the end of the day she definitely didn't need to be put in here the other girls have real problems mothers addicted to drugs they have been abused and some even on drugs themselves that isn't my daughters case. Most of the staff act like children. My daughters stuff have been getting stolen by the others and nobody is doing anything about it she told them multiple times so when I intervened a staff member told her not to tell her mother who's name I have but won't put on here just yet but why don't they want her telling me also they can only talk on the phone for 10 minutes at a time people get 30 minutes in jail and don't get me started on what they call "school" they mix the grades up sit them in front of a computer and don't teach my daughter needs to be in a real school also she is a very talented artist she can draw and paint extremely well I bought her a sketch book and they took her pens away this place is complete bullshit and things need to change ASAP ok adding to this someone named Ms Lisa is the one telling my daughter not to tell me things and now she's took her own personal television away that was bought for her what reason this staff member doesn't need to be working with children

The conditions at this facility are deeply concerning, especially regarding its treatment of high-needs and low-functioning residents. One case involved a 14-year-old on the autism spectrum who required sensory accommodations and individualized care. Instead of receiving such support, staff frequently disregarded his needs, forcing him into activities he found distressing. His resistance was met not with understanding, but with punishment, worsening his emotional state and causing repeated meltdowns. This lack of empathy showed that the institution prioritized control over genuine care.The institution s restrictive rules created a prison-like atmosphere, increasing stress for all residents. Basic freedoms were routinely denied, with residents forced to participate in scheduled activities regardless of their readiness. Any resistance was viewed as behavior to correct instead of a need for agency in an overwhelming environment. Runaways became common, as residents, overwhelmed by the lack of autonomy and support, attempted to escape by any means necessary. This relentless mental strain, compounded by the facility s rules, stripped residents of dignity and basic rights.Staff members frequently conducted invasive searches without cause, rifling through personal items, reading journals, and confiscating belongings under vague guideline violations. These rules were never clearly outlined, showing an institutional disregard for privacy and autonomy. The staff s treatment of belongings sent a clear message: residents were to be controlled, not understood.The institution s public image was also a faade. The website portrays an environment of hope and support, complete with carefully chosen photos and videos. One video shows a teacher writing on a whiteboard, yet in reality, traditional teaching methods were absent. Residents were confined to heavily monitored computers to complete assignments with little interaction, and students who finished work early were forced to sit in silence, rather than being offered additional activities or accommodations. This lack of engagement underscored the disconnect between their public image and the actual experience.Conflict and aggression were common, and staff s handling of such situations was not to de-escalate but to overpower. The institution relied on a security team of large staff members trained to restrain residents in excessively forceful ways. I witnessed several incidents where physical interventions led to harm. In one disturbing case, a young man attempted to defend a counselor from an aggressive resident, only to be slammed to the ground by security, leading to him bleeding from his mouth. His good intentions were met with brutality, and rather than recognizing his attempt to help, he was treated as a threat.This excessive use of physical force underscored the institution s focus on control over safety. Residents were often physically restrained in ways that went beyond what was necessary for order, causing real physical harm and trauma. The approach was not about supporting these vulnerable individuals but asserting power and control over them.Basic dietary needs were frequently dismissed, with some residents left hungry due to staff s dismissive attitudes. Those with dietary restrictions were accused of being snobby or ungrateful and were told to stomach it and be quiet. These practices created an environment of neglect, with no consideration for residents health and well-being.Moreover, racial bias was evident in daily interactions. Certain staff members treated African American residents favorably, while Caucasian residents were treated with open disdain. This discrimination only fueled divisions and deepened the residents distress.This institution s harmful practices, poor standards of care, and discriminatory policies should be addressed by regulatory bodies and the public to prevent further harm. It is a deeply troubling environment that damages those it claims to help.

Before joing Murphy Harpst I didn't think "loving a job" was ever a thing. Working for the youth has been such a blessing to my life. Anytime working with youth with mental health or behavioral, there will always be challenges and obstacles, but also comes rewarding and heartfelt memories. I have seen and been part of Murphy Harpst continuous improvements to provide the best. My shout outs go to Mel, Nyoka, Dr.Tony, and Tammy. They have been supportive to me and my journey at Murphy.Let's not forget Ms. Dianna and Scott who always great you with smiles and humbleness.